Category Archives: Abortion

Now Is The Winter Of Our Discontent — A Liberal’s Calm Before The Storm

Made glorious summer by this sun of Windy City;
And all the clouds that lour’d upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried…

…for how long?

For some of us the inauguration of Barack Obama ushered in the potential for an era of liberal progress, of recovery from the dark clouds of George W. Bush… illegal wars, reactionary social policy, and economic destruction.

The republican party nomination process stimulated my presaging fear of tumult as I witnessed enthusiastic applause for the proposed destruction / elimination of women’s’ rights, civil and marriage rights, health care access, criminalized physical expressions of hate, and responsible stewardship of earth’s resources.

While I know that I am not alone in my liberal desires for a more progressive and better nation, it sure feels a lot lonelier.

As I contemplated my sense of alienation and just how far I am away from the American political norm, a battery of political spectrum tests proved that, indeed, I am a Liberal Elite in a right wing, conservative nation…and it is not a good feeling.

For the Liberal Elite contemplating the national mood, it may soon be another kind of Winter…the end (winter) of our contentment…


Pope Benedict XVI: Gay Marriage A Threat To ‘Future Of Humanity’

“This is not a simple social convention, but rather the fundamental cell of every society. Consequently, policies which undermine the family threaten human dignity and the future of humanity itself” -Pope Benedict XVI

VATICAN CITY, Jan 9 (Reuters) – Pope Benedict said on January 9th, 2012 that gay marriage was one of several threats to the traditional family that undermined “the future of humanity itself”.

The pope made his strongest comments against gay marriage in a new year address to the diplomatic corps accredited to the Vatican in which he touched on some economic and social issues facing the world today.

He told diplomats from nearly 180 countries that the education of children needed proper “settings” and that “pride of place goes to the family, based on the marriage of a man and a woman.”

The Vatican and Catholic officials have protested against moves to legalize gay marriage in Europe and other developed parts of the world. Gay marriage is legal in a number of advanced civilized European countries, including Spain and the Netherlands.

One leading opponent of gay marriage in the United States is New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan, who fought against gay marriage before it became legal in New York state last June, and in September sent a letter to President Barack Obama criticizing his administration’s decision not to support a federal ban on gay marriage.

The Roman Catholic Church, which has some 1.3 billion members worldwide, teaches that while homosexual tendencies are not sinful, homosexual acts are, and that children should grow up in a traditional family with a mother and a father.

“The family unit is fundamental for the educational process and for the development both of individuals and states; hence there is a need for policies which promote the family and aid social cohesion and dialogue,” Benedict told the diplomats.

——————————

Threats To Humanity? Plentiful, but…

Listen, Pope… I’m supposed to take seriously a sheltered, celibate man who dresses in medieval garb? A dress, no less? The validity of your ideas are so far removed from reality, that it confounds why your banal utterances are even reported as news.

Truth be known, Pope, there are real threats to the future of Humanity:

-It’s the Catholic Church that is a threat to the “Future of Humanity”. Look no further than all of the sex scandals rocking the Catholic world, the young boys’ lives you’ve ruined, the deaths you have caused. It’s shameful and an embarrassment to modern civilization­.

-Humanity — the quality or lack thereof — as you advocate… a threat to future of Humanity.

-Religion has throughout history led to judgment and war against the heathen; it continues as a great threat to Humanity.

-Great threat to the future of Humanity: uncontrolled human breeding, which all the major religions not only accept but vigorously promote. Ergo, it’s not a stretch to say that organized religion itself is a threat to the future of humanity, based purely on its stance on birth control.

-Far more than an honest, loving “gay marriage,” it is ” Catholic intolerance­” as the threat to Humanity.

- A clear example of one of the great problems of the world today: “Half” the population has entered the 21st century and the other “half” still has its head in the Dark Ages. All of this “old world” thinking is being driven by the established religions of the world… science and logical thinking be damned.

The Catholic Church. Still hundreds of years behind the times.

No church should ever be forced to recognize gay marriage, or any other kind of marriage which violates its moral standards, but that is NOT the issue at hand, here. Pope Benedict is not worried that the laws of various countries will force his church to accept gay marriages, he is worried that laws allowing gay marriage would allow other religions to recognize them. He wants our government to enforce the Catholic Church’s version of morality.

The Taliban is an evil in the world because it is intolerant­, ruthless, and dictatorial­… NOT because it is Muslim. Your Christian Taliban is no better.

“We establish no religion in this country, we command no worship, we mandate no belief, nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate.” - Ronald Reagan


SHE NEEDS MORE SEX: Rise of The American Social Taliban

American Republicans: “I Do Want to Turn Back the Clock”

Over the weekend, a New York Times editorial properly accused the GOP of waging a “War on Women.” The editors call a spate of bills that would limit funding for abortion, contraceptives, and maternal health initiatives  “an assault on women’s health and freedom” and warn that “this is just the beginning” — which, of course, is true.

But at the staunchly conservative National Review, Kathryn Jean Lopez — entrapped by her own familial/cultural history and the confines of her dictatorial Catholicism — says conservatives aren’t waging a war on women, just a war on sex. She argues that most Americans are entirely too casual about copulating, and as a result…

“we’ve let Planned Parenthood step in as a mainstream band-aid, applying contraception and even abortion to problems that require much more fundamental solutions.”

While most likely a great deal of stress and potential, harmful sexual “acting-out” have been alleviated by movement toward wonderfully enjoyable consensual sex, Lopez would have us believe that because casual sex is inherently harmful… the best solution, then: to defund the organizations that make so much consequence-free hanky-panky possible.

Truth, though, is simply that many Planned Parenthood clients are married women trying to conserve the family’s resources for the children they already have. Conservatives love the unborn and love lots of procreation, but their interest wanes rapidly as the conditions of lives degrade by their own policies.

If liberals accuse Lopez of turning back the clock on women’s rights (and we do), that’s fine with her.

“I do want to turn back the clock,” she says. “To a time when we valued love and marriage and didn’t expect, support, and even encourage promiscuity.”

Oh my! Lions and tigers and bear! Get real!

The American Taliban Party contradiction: Interestingly, it seems to be Right-wing conservatives including Newt Gingrich, John McCain, and Guilianni who have had serial marriages, mistresses, and even discarded sick wives for hotter models, and yet are considered by conservatives to be presidential material.

This conservatism — this American Social Taliban — is inherently pathological… a disease of the mind and spirit… wielding tools of democracy destructively.

The truth of the matter, though, is that bills limiting funding for abortion, contraceptives, and maternal health initiatives are injurious to women. It is absolutely reprehensible that in our modern age we must revisit the conversation of maturing and progressing as a functional society:

  • Yes, let’s go back to putting scarlet “A”‘s on women’s chests and stone a few more in public squares. The National Review was always backward looking, but this is astounding. The American Social Taliban is alive and well in the Republican Party and the hearts of most conservatives.
  • Ah yes, if only we can turn back the clock to that magical, long ago time that never actually existed…
  • Frankly, the new Republican/conservative movement is a regressive return to the social and legal inequalities commonly imposed upon women by a patriarchal culture.

John Stuart Mill — noted late-nineteenth-century British philosopher and authorargued correctly that inequality of women was a relic from the past, but it had no place in the modern world. Mill saw this subjugation of women as a hindrance to human development, since effectively half the human race were unable to contribute to society outside of the home confines.

“… [T]he legal subordination of one sex to another — is wrong in itself, and now one of the chief hindrances to human improvement; and that it ought to be replaced by a system of perfect equality, admitting no power and privilege on the one side, nor disability on the other.”


A Conservative Pathology of Proposals

It might seem hyperbolic to say that Republicans have declared a war on propriety.

Unfortunately, it is not.

Let’s look at only 10 shocking, crazy proposals advanced by Republicans in recent weeks:

1) Republicans not only want to reduce women’s access to abortion care, they’re actually trying to redefine rape. After a major backlash, they promised to stop. But they haven’t.

2) A state legislator in Georgia wants to change the legal term for victims of rape, stalking, and domestic violence to “accuser.” But victims of other less gendered crimes, like burglary, would remain “victims.”

3) In South Dakota, Republicans proposed a bill that could make it legal to murder a doctor who provides abortion care. (Yep, for real.)

4) Republicans want to cut nearly a billion dollars of food and other aid to low-income pregnant women, mothers, babies, and kids.

5) In Congress, Republicans have proposed a bill that would let hospitals allow a woman to die rather than perform an abortion necessary to save her life.

6) Maryland Republicans ended all county money for a low-income kids’ preschool program. Why? No need, they said. Women should really be home with the kids, not out working.

7) And at the federal level, Republicans want to cut that same program, Head Start, by $1 billion. That means over 200,000 kids could lose their spots in preschool.

8 ) Two-thirds of the elderly poor are women, and Republicans are taking aim at them too. A spending bill would cut funding for employment services, meals, and housing for senior citizens.

9) Congress voted yesterday on a Republican amendment to cut all federal funding from Planned Parenthood health centers, one of the most trusted providers of basic health care and family planning in our country.

10) And if that wasn’t enough, Republicans are pushing to eliminate all funds for the only federal family planning program. (For humans. But Republican Dan Burton has a bill to provide contraception for wild horses. You can’t make this stuff up)

 


Having a Baby May Be Worse for Mental Health Than Having an Abortion

Now How Could THAT Be?

According to a new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, having an abortion does not increase a woman’s risk of having mental health problems, but actually giving birth and keeping a baby does.

The study, conducted by Danish researchers, based on the medical records of 265,550 Danish women who did not have a history of mental health problems before getting pregnant, “further debunks the notion that terminating a pregnancy can trigger mental illness and shows postpartum depression to be much more of a factor.”

The study’s lead researcher concluded, “A woman should know that her risk of having a psychiatric episode is not increased,” after aborting.

Jezebel isn’t surprised (“having an abortion is essentially the end of the event, whereas having a baby is a 24/7 experience, fraught with both physical and emotional stresses”), and the folks at LifeNews are horrified (“there is plenty of evidence suggesting that the negative effects of abortion may not surface for several years”).


Conversation With A Tea Partier

Words Have Actual Meanings!

A Tea Party Patriot tries to explain how our freedoms are in jeopardy.

VOTE as if your very Freedoms depend upon it and are threatened!

Because American Freedoms are threatened… by Ignorance and Basic American Apathy.

________________________

You know, all kidding aside, the danger from the Tea Party and Tea Baggers themselves… comes not from the fact that they have a different opinion than I and other progressives (Who cares? Diversity of opinion is valuable and fun)

  • The threat to American Freedoms is the very lack of inquisitiveness (I know… big word for most) in the Tea Bagger character and the seemingly absolute disregard for fact-based thought.*
  • The threat of the Tea Bagging movement is the validation of ignorance as a character-builder.*
  • The threat of Tea Partying is “lack-of-knowledge” as a point of American Pride.*

The rather large number of serious conversations I have had with Tea Baggers and Libertarians who spoke, advocated, and debated much like this political cartoon is nothing short of profoundly shocking.

And the sad thing is… it’s generally my generation that seems most enmeshed in the movement and its emotional appeal. I know we were taught to think better than this… I know because I was there with them… learning to think, not just to react and parrot back a party line. What the hell happened to us?

We will be the generation that fails the nation and the youth. Sad.

* Yes, I would say I can be labeled a Proud Member of the Intellectual Elite


RALLY TO RESTORE SANITY AND/OR FEAR Application

Get The Free Rally App on Your iPhone, iTouch and iPad

Before you head to D.C. for the Rally of a lifetime — or at least a weekend — download the official Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert-approved Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear application today for free in the iPhone App Store.

View maps, upload photos, share comments, and check in on Foursquare to earn one-of-a-kind badges! WooHoo!

 

Android phone lovers, your app is on its way, as well!


Laura Bush Defies “W” — Supports Gay Marriage & Abortion Rights

Laura Bush—the quiet one, the boring one, the woman too nice to offend—spoke with Larry King to promote her new memoir, Spoken from the Heart.

With a few short utterances, she dismantled much of what we thought we knew about the former First Lady.

Laura Bush, on same-sex marriage: “When couples are committed to each other, and love each other, they ought to have, I think, the same sort of rights that everyone else has.”

Laura Bush, on abortion: “I think it’s important that it remain legal, because I think it’s important for people, for medical reasons, and other reasons.”

“I really do understand his [W's] viewpoint,” she assured all. “And he understands mine,” she added to reinforce the fact of their differences.

Click to enlarge image

Make no mistake about Bush’s book, however. Spoken from the Heart reads as a clear effort to repair George W. Bush’s reputation, and too often engages the manipulative rhetoric that characterized his presidency.

The book asks, as example, “What, for instance, would the world have said if, in 1999, the United States had invaded Afghanistan? But had we done so, might the World Trade Center be standing today?” It’s a rhetorically inane question, but… Game on! Let’s preemptively invade every country! Then nothing bad will ever happen to us!

Before we Liberals “fall in love” with Laura, however, we must consider how Mrs. Bush remained quiet on these crucial human rights issues for eight years, choosing to ignore her beliefs in order to continue standing by her man. Honestly, though, what loyal spouse isn’t going to broadly defend their spouse?

The most important point, though, is that Laura Bush chose this time to announce her true thoughts on two very contentious and unsettled issuestwo of THIS President’s most contentious issues he will soon confront… with Laura Bush having chosen OBAMA’S side!

Share


How Christian Were the Founders? – Texas Approves Conservatives’ Revised Fundamentalist Curriculum

How Christian Were the Founders? – NYTimes.com.

The Lord Cheers On the Founding Fathers

LAST MONTH, A WEEK before the Senate seat of the liberal icon Edward M. Kennedy fell into Republican hands, his legacy suffered another blow that was perhaps just as damaging, if less noticed. It happened during what has become an annual spectacle in the culture wars…

Texas Board of Education members… the most influential state board of education in the country, and one of the most politically conservative, submitted their proposed changes to the new social-studies curriculum guidelines, whose adoption is the subject of much attention — guidelines that will affect students around the country, from kindergarten to 12th grade, for the next 10 years…

Finally, the board considered an amendment to require students to evaluate the contributions of significant Americans. The names proposed included Thurgood Marshall, Billy Graham, Newt Gingrich, William F. Buckley Jr., Hillary Rodham Clinton and Edward Kennedy. All passed muster except Kennedy, who was voted down…

This is how history is made — or rather, how the hue and cry of the present and near past gets lodged into the long-term cultural memory or else is allowed to quietly fade into an inaudible whisper…

As Cynthia Dunbar, a Christian activist on the Texas board, put it, “The philosophy of the classroom in one generation will be the philosophy of the government in the next.”

AUSTIN, Tex. — The Texas Board of Education on Friday, March 12th voted to approve a social studies curriculum standard that places a conservative stamp on history and economics textbooks, stressing:

  • the superiority of American capitalism,
  • questioning the Founding Father’s commitment to a purely secular government, and
  • presenting Republican political philosophies in a more positive light.

Kansas City announces it’s closing half of the city’s public schools, and Now… This? Democracy demands an educated, thoughtful citizenry. The United States continues its hurtling degradation toward a second-tier nation behind Europe and China. While the advanced nations progress and improve quality of life, the U.S. degrades and suffers deterioration of lifestyle, opportunities, peace, and freedoms… but… energetically sings some old-time hymns to the Lord along the way.

Voting 11 to 4, ten Republicans and one Democrat voted for the curriculum standards, and four Democrats voted against. The board’s influence radiates well beyond Texas because the state is one of the largest purchasers of textbooks. Reviewed every decade, the standards serve as a template for textbook publishers, who must present drafts of their books to the Board next year.

A board of professional teachers proposed the original standards, but since January, Republicans on the board passed more than 160 amendments to the 120-page teacher-recommended curriculum standards affecting history, sociology and economics courses from elementary to high school.

Hispanic board members’ efforts to include more Latino figures as role models for the state’s large Hispanic population consistently fell to defeat, prompting one member, Mary Helen Berlanga, to storm out of a meeting late Thursday night, saying,

They can just pretend this is a white America and Hispanics don’t exist… They are going overboard, they are not experts, they are not historians… They are rewriting history, not only of Texas but of the United States and the world.

For years, Board of Education members engaged in an ideological battle between a bloc of conservatives who question Darwin’s theory of evolution and believe the Founding Fathers were guided by Christian principles and a handful of Democrats and moderate Republicans who have fought to preserve the fact-based and scientific teaching of Darwinism and the separation of church and state that Thomas Jefferson clearly documented as original intent.

No historians, sociologists or economists were consulted at the meetings, though some members of the conservative bloc held themselves out as experts on certain topics. For instance, leader of the board’s conservative faction, Dr. Don McLeroy says, “I’m a dentist, not a historian. But I’m fascinated by history, so I’ve read a lot.” A self-proclaimed Christian fundamentalist, McLeroy then explained how his Christian perspective both governs his work on the state board and guides him in the current effort to adjust American history textbooks to highlight the role of Christianity.

Well, golly, I guess if you watch a lot of movies, too, you’re qualified to be a movie director, producer, or Hollywood executive! The idiocy of conservatives’ logic never ceases to astound and insult.

The Lord inspected The Declaration of Independence, and He was well pleased

The conservative members maintain that they are trying to correct what they see as a liberal bias among the teachers who proposed the curriculum. To that end, they made dozens of minor changes aimed at calling into question, among other things, concepts like the separation of church and state and the secular nature of the American Revolution.

“Textbooks are mostly the product of the liberal establishment, and they’re written with the idea that our religion and our liberty are in conflict,” proclaimed McLeroy. “But Christianity has had a deep impact on our system. The men who wrote the Constitution were Christians who knew the Bible [Well, never mind the fact that founding fathers were self-professed Deists believing in a non-intervening "God of Nature" ]. Our idea of individual rights comes from the Bible. The Western development of the free-market system owes a lot to biblical principles.”

“I reject the notion by the left of a constitutional separation of church and state,” said David Bradley, a conservative from Beaumont who works in real estate. “I have $1,000 for the charity of your choice if you can find it in the Constitution.”

They also included a plank to ensure that students learn about “the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schalfly, the Contract With America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the National Rifle Association.”

Dr. McLeroy pushed through a change to teaching about the civil rights movement to ensure that students study the violent philosophy of the Black Panthers in addition to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s nonviolent approach. He also made sure that textbooks would mention the votes in Congress on civil rights legislation, which Republicans supported.

“Republicans need a little credit for that,” he said. “I think it’s going to surprise some students.” Wow! That’s fairly ballsy. The Republicans have never met Civil Rights legislation they didn’t hate!

Mr. Bradley won approval for an amendment saying students should study “the unintended consequences” of the Great Society legislation, affirmative action and Title IX legislation (yeh, like more equitable and improving incomes, better nutrition and health, equal and not separate education… actually delivering on the promises the nation professes).

He also won approval for an amendment stressing that Germans and Italians were interned in the United States as well as the Japanese during World War II, to counter the idea that the internment of Japanese was motivated by racism. Another wow! Really? That’s interesting because half of my family came from Germany, lived near DC, and never mentioned they were suspect or even potentially interned.

Other changes seem aimed at tamping down criticism of the right. Conservatives passed one amendment, for instance, requiring that the history of McCarthyism include “how the later release of the Venona papers confirmed suspicions of communist infiltration in U.S. government.” The Venona papers were transcripts of some 3,000 communications between the Soviet Union and its agents in the United States.

In economics, the revisions add economic fascists Milton Friedman and Friedrich von Hayek, two champions of free-market economic theory, among the usual list of economists to be studied, like Adam Smith, Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes. They also replaced the word “capitalism” throughout their texts with the “free-enterprise system.”

“Let’s face it, capitalism does have a negative connotation,” said one conservative member, Terri Leo. “You know, ‘capitalist pig!’ ”

In the field of sociology, another conservative member, Barbara Cargill, won passage of an amendment requiring the teaching of “the importance of personal responsibility for life choices” in a section on teen suicide, dating violence, sexuality, drug use and eating disorders.

“The topic of sociology tends to blame society for everything,” Ms. Cargill said. Hummm… Or maybe sociology professionals tend to explore the development of the individual within a society. No one lives in a vacuum, on an island alone, or is unaffected by their environment.

Even the course on World History did not escape the board’s scalpel.

Cynthia Dunbar, a lawyer from Richmond who is a strict constitutionalist and thinks the nation was founded on Christian beliefs, managed to cut Thomas Jefferson from a list of figures whose writings inspired revolutions in the late 18th century and 19th century, replacing him with St. Thomas Aquinas, John Calvin and William Blackstone. (Jefferson is not well liked among the conservatives on the board because he coined the term “separation between church and state.”)

So… understand the thrust of conservatives’ arrogance… Thomas Jefferson, THE author of this nation’s Declaration of Independence (the single-most influential document EVER to influence revolutionary movements towards independence, freedom, and democratization)… this Thomas Jefferson will not be listed in textbooks citing revolution-inspiring literary works, but three religious geeks that had nothing to do with our revolution will be cited! Man, the Chinese government has nothing over American conservatives!

“The Enlightenment was not the only philosophy on which these revolutions were based,” Ms. Dunbar said.

Well, Ms. Dunbar, that’s utter bullshit, as the founding fathers themselves clearly documented that both Science and The Enlightenment created their motivating philosophy. These anti-intellectual, conservative dolts should read the recent book, “The Science of Liberty: Democracy, Reason, and the Laws of Nature,” as it makes the case for science as the inspiration behind the rise of liberalism and democracy. Ferris, the author, argues that just as the scientific revolution rescued billions from poverty, fear, hunger, and disease, the Enlightenment values it inspired swelled the number of persons living in free and democratic societies from less than 1 percent of the world population four centuries ago to more than a third today. Sorry but while it may be an inconvenient truth, it is still the truth that Science and The Enlightenment established the primary philosophy advancing progress and liberty.

The Lord watches over His Victory

Mavis B. Knight, a Democrat from Dallas, introduced an amendment requiring that students study the reasons “the founding fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring the government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion above all others.”

It was defeated on a party-line vote.


New American Dawn: The Racial Tipping Point Arrives

More Minority Babies Will Be Born In 2010 Than White Babies, Demographers Predict.

Demographers suspect that 2010 could be the “tipping year,” that is, the year in which more minority babies are born than white babies in this country as the United States steadily marches toward becoming a minority-majority nation. (A minority-majority nation is one in which no recognized racial group makes up more than half of the population.) “The numbers are growing because immigration to the U.S. has boosted the number of Hispanic women in their prime childbearing years,” the Associated Press reported. “Minorities made up 48 percent of U.S. children born in 2008, the latest census estimates available, compared to 37 percent in 1990.” Also contributing to the “tipping,” more and more white women are waiting longer to have children.Currently, approximately 300 of the United States’ roughly 3,000 counties are minority-majority. “The numbers highlight the nation’s growing racial and age divide, seen in pockets of communities across the U.S., which could heighten tensions in current policy debates from immigration reform and education to health care and Social Security,” the AP reported.
How will the nation react or adjust with time? Could be “White Flight” for a different time and age. Could be opportunity for assimilation and integration.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 105 other followers